I have written a shell for my negative case. Does anyone have any thoughts or critique on this? I am up for anything.
When in conflict, personal freedom ought to be valued above economic security.
Value: Personal Happiness Criterion: Use and Maximization of Personal Freedom and Economic Security.
Contention 1: Personal Freedom and Economic Security are symbiotic with each other. They relate to achieve the best Personal Happiness.
Contention 2: Those who are incapable of meeting their basic needs have trouble successfully exercising personal freedom.
Contention 3: Those who are economically secure, but do not have the ability to make choices about how their income is going to be used, are in a form of bondage and are not personally free.
Contention 4: Therefore we need both; you cannot value one over the other because they go together.
"Music is the new Latin. When music is written or played it is a universal language that requires no translation to true musicians." - L-Dawg of Caesarea