DA Uniqueness thumper

Exchange plans, get ideas and ask questions about all areas concerning affirmative cases.

Moderator: lsabino

DA Uniqueness thumper

Postby brubaie » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:56 pm

NASA is performing tons and tons of different missions now. If the negative simply argues that costly new space missions are bad, remind them that dozens are occuring now but none of them are your affirmative.
http://www.militaryaerospace.com/index/ ... 07831.html
NASA officials aren’t resting on their laurels, however. In fact, over the past few months, NASA has been making headlines each week—far more often than it had in the past several years. The organization is increasingly partnering with technology companies in the aerospace industry, as well, announcing contract opportunities and hosting industry events.

Just this month, in fact, NASA personnel have revealed an undersea mission, a next-gen space observatory, student competitions, tweetups (I shudder at the thought of this “word” making it into the dictionary), and the need for expendable launch vehicles, propulsion systems, and much more.
----
Brian Rubaie, Director
brian dot rubaie at ncpa dot org
User avatar
brubaie
nu
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: DA Uniqueness thumper

Postby brubaie » Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:32 pm

More evidence on this matter:
http://spacepolicyonline.com/pages/inde ... &Itemid=27
The Senate is beginning debate on the "minibus" appropriations bill, H.R. 2112, that combines the bills for Agriculture, Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS), and Transportation-HUD (T-HUD). The Obama Administration said today that it "strongly supports" passage of the bill.

The CJS bill includes NASA and NOAA. In its Statement of Administration Policy (SAP), the Administration supported the Senate Appropriations Committee's actions. For NOAA's Joint Polar Satellite System, which would receive $920 million instead of the $1.07 billion requested, the SAP notes that it is less than what is needed to maintain the current launch date of 2017 for JPSS-1 and "encourages" the Senate not to cut any further.

For NASA, the SAP "appreciates" support for the Space Launch System, Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, and James Webb Space Telescope. Although the committee significantly cut funding for space technology, the SAP simply "urges" the full Senate to provide that level of funding ($637 million instead of the $1.02 billion requested). Similarly for commercial crew, which would be cut from $850 million to $500 million, the SAP "encourages" the Senate to provide sufficient funding to prevent delays in the program.

The FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation is not mentioned in the T-HUD part of the SAP. Its FY2012 request of $26.5 million was cut in half by the Senate Appropriations Committee.
----
Brian Rubaie, Director
brian dot rubaie at ncpa dot org
User avatar
brubaie
nu
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: Dallas, TX


Return to C-X Affirmative

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests